In october 1997, gratz and hamacher filed a lawsuit in the united states district court for the eastern district of michigan against the university of michigan, the lsa,2 james duderstadt, and lee bollinger. Bollinger audio transcription for opinion announcement june 23, 2003 in gratz v. The court said consideration of race as one of many factors in the pursuit of a diverse student body is a compelling interest that produces educational benefits for all students, and further held that any consideration of race must be done in an individualized and. Bollinger was a united states supreme court case regarding the university of michigan undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy. Support our response to covid19 your gift will fund our critical work to protect voting rights, demand that vulnerable people in prisons, jails and immigration detention centers be released, and fight to ensure reproductive health care remains open and accessible to all who need it. Several years after cirs historic victory in the fifth circuit, hopwood v.
I join the courts opinion because i believe it correctly applies our precedents, including todays decision in grutter v. Bollinger, with the majority opinion sanctioning the use of affirmative action in higher education. Justice clarence thomas wrote a separate opinion, concurring in part and dissenting in part from the courts judgment, in order to emphasize his view that government consideration of race for any purpose is unconstitutional. Bollinger syllabus guidelines for those seeking admission to the lsa, including freshman and transfer applicants. Argued april 1, 2003decided june 23, 2003 petitioners gratz and hamacher, both of whom are michigan residents and caucasian, applied for. Race may be considered in an individual assessment, but not as a sole or contributing factor for admission. The two cases were filed in 1997 by white plaintiffs who alleged that the universitys use of race violated their constitutional right to equal protection. Start studying ap government supreme court cases quiz. Bollinger, a similar case, and upheld the universitys admission policies in that case. Bollinger, post, at 1521, the court has today rejected petitioners argument that diversity cannot constitute a compelling state interest. The procedure automatically added 20 points onto the. Bollinger and that the admissions policy of the university of michigan law school did not. Bollinger lawsuit was dismissed today as the result of an agreement among the parties.
On april 1, 2003 the supreme court heard oral arguments for the case, along with grutter v. The law school admits that it uses race as a factor in making admissions decisions because it serves a compelling interest in. Learn how to combine multiple files and file types together using nitro pro. Constitution, and the federal civil rights statute, 42. Bollinger case concludes university of michigan news. Select or drag your files, then click the merge button to download your document into one pdf file. Bollingerdissenting opinion ruth bader ginsburg if honesty is the best policy, surely michigans accurately described, fully disclosed college affirmative action program is preferable to achieving similar numbers through winks, nods, and disguises. Mar 20, 2017 following is the case brief for grutter v. Bollinger, challenged the affirmative action admissions practices of the university of michigans undergraduate and law school programs, respectively. On writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit june 23, 2003 justice thomas, concurring. The second opinion which i have to announce is in the case of 02516, jennifer gratz versus lee bollinger. In a 63 decision announced on june 23, 2003, the supreme court ruled that the universitys point system was too mechanistic and therefore unconstitutional.
In a 63 decision announced on june 23, 2003, the supreme court ruled that the universitys point system was too. Bollinger decisions, pair of cases addressing the issue of affirmative action in which the u. The court made clear that the consideration of race as one of many factors in the pursuit of a diverse student body is a compelling interest that produces educational benefits for all students, and further held that any. In a 63 decision announced on june 23, 2003, the supreme court ruled the universitys point system was too mechanistic and unconstitutional. Argued april 1, 2003decided june 23, 2003 impact in both cases, caucasian students that were well above the qualified standards of the university were denied admission. Bollinger, the plaintiffs, who are caucasians and were denied undergraduate admission to the university of michigan, filed a class action against the university, alleging that the university violated title vi of the civil rights act of 1964, the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the u. Grutters credentials lsat score of 161 and grade point average of 3. Grutter concerned the universitys law school admission plan. Almost every applicant to the university who was africanamerican, hispanic, or native american was admitted to the universitys undergraduate program, which allowed consideration of race.
Constitution, and the federal civil rights statute, 42 u. Supreme court ruled on june 23, 2003, that the undergraduate admissions policy of the university of michigan violated the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the u. Texas, which struck down the use of racial preferences in all states in the fifth circuit, the sixth circuit court of appeals upheld the use of the racial preferences program at the university of michigan. Bollinger 2003, the university of michigan came under fire for its admissions policies. They argued that the admission procedure discriminated against certain racial and ethnic groups in violation of the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment and title vi of the civil rights act of 1964. Supreme courts historic 2003 decisions upholding diversity as a compelling interest, but requiring changes in the mechanics o. Bollinger, united states supreme court, 2003 case summary for gratz v. Bollinger neal devinst by approving raceconscious university admissions, the rehnquist court echoed the opinions of congress, the states, big business, academics, newspapers, and, to a lesser extent, the bush administration in short, rather than join forces with the politically isolated opponents.
In a 63 decision announced on june 23, 2003, chief justice rehnquist, writing for the court, ruled the universitys point systems predetermined point allocations that awarded 20 points towards admission to. Along with that decision, the supreme court largely upheld its decision in 1978s regents of the university of california v. Gratz was a white applicant from michigan who was denied admission to the university of michigan, as well as another similarly situated applicant. Argued april 1, 2003decided june 23, 2003 grutter v. Diversity is a compelling interest that can justify the narrowly tailored use of race when public universities select applicants for admission. Principal controlling authorities cases adarand constructors v. Jennifer gratz and patrick hamacher, petitioners v. Soda pdf merge tool allows you to combine pdf files in seconds.
Admission criteria based on race must be narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling interest. Casey equal protection and the right to privacy were the issues in this case, which was decided that minors needed to have parental consent when obtaining an abortion but wives did not need the consent of the husband. Bollinger 2003 barbara grutter, michigan resident and applicant to the law school at the university of michigan, filed an injunction against the university in 2007. Bollinger, in which the court later upheld affirmative action in general. Pdf merge combine pdf files free tool to merge pdf online.
The university of michigan developed an admission scale for applicants that provided a maximum of 150 points, with 100 points being all thats needed for guaranteed admission. In reversing, the court of appeals held that justice powells opinion in regents of the university of california v. Argued april 1, 2003decided june 23, 2003 the university of michigan law school law school, one of the nations top law schools, follows an of. Unlike the law school admissions policy the court upholds today in grutter v. On october 14 1997 plaintiffs filed a class action against the university of michigan and various. University of texas at austin, the supreme court vacated and remanded an appeals court decision that had rejected a challenge to an affirmative action program modeled on the one approved in gratz, finding that the lower. In 1997, barbara grutter, a white resident of michigan, applied for admission to the university of michigan law school. The court held that a student admissions process that favors underrepresented minority groups does not violate the fourteenth amendments equal protection clause so long as it takes into account other factors evaluated on an individual. Two caucasians challenged the university of michigans admissions policy after being denied entry into the undergraduate program, claiming the procedure violated the 14th amendments equal protection clause. I join the courts opinion because i believe it correctly applies our precedents, including. The two cases were filed in 1997 by white plaintiffs who alleged that the universitys use of race violated their constitutional right to equal protection of the laws. He explained that such a program might allow for the file of a particular black appli. Bollinger, 1997 the school also rejected barbara grutters application because she was white. Chief justice william rehnquist majority opinion in gratz et al.
Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Plaintiff barbara grutter files a similar lawsuit challenging racebased admissions at the university of michigan law school. Argued april 1, 2003decided june 23, 2003 petitioners gratz and hamacher, both of whom are michigan residents and caucasian, applied for admission to the university of michigans. Grutter claimed that the law schools use of affirmative action in its admissions policy violated her equal. However, the court finds that the universitys current policy, which automatically distributes 20 points, or onefifth of the points needed to guarantee admission, to every single underrepresented minority applicant solely because of race, is not narrowly tailored to achieve educational diversity. Court of appeals for the sixth circuit heard this case the same day as grutter v.
Our pdf merger allows you to quickly combine multiple pdf files into one single pdf document, in just a few clicks. The university of michigan law school denied barbara grutters application to the school. Combine multiple pdf files into one pdf, try foxit pdf merge tool online free and easy to use. This webapp provides a simple way to merge pdf files. Audio transcription for oral argument april 01, 2003 in gratz v. In october 1997, gratz and hamacher filed a class action suit against the university, the lsa, lee bollinger, and james duderstadt. By contrast, the office of undergraduate admissions relies on the selection index to assign every underrepresented minority applicant the same, automatic 20point bonus without consideration of the particular background, experiences, or qualities of each individual applicant. Supreme courts admonition to seriously consider other options before using raceconscious admissions policies schmidt, 2008, p. Ap government supreme court cases quiz flashcards quizlet. The university of michigan law school defendant receives more th. In 2003, the supreme court decided the landmark cases of gratz v. The petitioners in this case then asked the court to grant certiorari, despite the lack of opinion from the lower court, to resolve the issue.
1209 1477 142 123 700 440 678 613 442 1545 358 1328 552 1529 1520 737 788 692 708 1138 664 1151 437 337 1356 335 1363 1299 1479 625 1296 759 1018 271 1329 120 1028 1110 181 1371 871 166 435 970 1291